急！！200分！求优秀汉译英！！！在线等！！ 急！！200分！求优秀汉译英（3）！！！在线等！！
以下是你发的4个提问，共3段，翻译的不好请指正。
PARA ONE
Personally, I think that, because of the differences in cultures, histories and ideologies between China and foreign countries, their journalism and education inevitably bear the above features.
However, they have similarities, too. From the perspective of historiography, if we look back on Chinese and American journalism, it is easy to find out that they both have gone through the similar development orbits. For instance, their newspapers have experienced three historical stages of development: remark newspapers (standpoint newspapers in China) → political party newspapers → business newspapers (commercial newspapers in China).
Furthermore, education has its universal law, and journalism as an independent subject with very strong practicality is the same in both the two countries with no lacks of comparison.
On the other hand, China's and America's journalism also have the very prodigious differences and their education respectively has their own features.
In America journalism is subjected to economy, while in China it is subjected doubly by economy and politics.
Speaking of the economy-journalism relations, in America journalism is industrialized, and in China mass media is also marketizing, but actually different from that of the US.
The journalism in China is different in form, but is suspected of taking over that of the US in its content.
From the viewpoint of academic history of journalism, the systems, views and methods of some journalism works kept identical with those of America on the whole.
To compare Chinese and Amercian journalism education, to explain detailly and objectively the culture , history and ideology which it relies on, will benefit us directly in estimating the feasibility if its method to be applied in China.
PARA TWO
The perspective and content by which things can be compared are very complicated.
Speaking of the connotation of this thesis, politics, society and culture background of the objects under study are different, so making the objects under study comparable is the basic premise.
Therefore, first it’s essential that we set the range of time of the thesis from the end of 1970s’ and the beginning of 1980s’ until now.
After 1978, freeed itself from the standstill dilemma of the Culture Revolution, Chinese education begun to revive and develop gradually; almost simultaneously (1982-1994) mass media in the US developed quickly, employees increased 40%, which, too, stimulated the development of journalism education.
Only by ascertaining the study in this specific scope of time, the comparison is comparable, reliable and effective.
Then it’s nessasary that we define the specific content and criteria of the comparison, such as training target, professional standard, curriculum set-up, teaching approach, education investment, governmental adjustment and control, the profiling of students and faculty, employment, other education forms and characteristics and so on.
This study focuses on the above integrated standard, identical comparison items and scope throughout the process of comparison.
Only when the both parties are comparable, and when they can be examined and estimated according to mutual standard, it’s possible that we make the study meaningful.
PARA THREE
Secondly, data collection and detailed desription.
Speaking of this thesis, data collection includes reference to documents, investigation and interview, symposium, examination on the spot and so on.
In order to reflect the objests under study comprehensively and objectively,
In the meantime, it’s necessary that the researchers be aware to select the data which are representative and convincing to make our reseaching target of comparison between Chinese and American journalism education phenomena meaningful and effective.
And by integrating the researching activities, making method scientific and statistics and measurement accurate, it’s ensured that the conclusion we get be correct and all the data be true and reliable.
Thirdly, seeing that journalism education is complicated itself, and the factors confined journalism education are of great quantity, it’s necessary that after the acquisition of large numbers of comparable data on Chinese and Amercian journalism edcation, we use the viewpoints and knownledge from mass media, pedagogy, pedagogical psychology, sociology, culturology，and political economics to explain and analyze, categorize them, and classify them into different types, so as to compare them comprehensively and multi-dimensionally surrounded the thesis, classify and compare the similarities and differences between Chinese and American journalism education, explain the origin of the similarities and differences between the two countries and make comprehensive analyses using dialetical and relative viewpoints.
Forthly, on the basis that similarities and differences are analyzed carefully, the journalism education of both countries are estimated comprehensively, essential law of education phenomenon is further explored.
Because of the difference in the way of thinking, it’s likely that different deduction and explanation can be made.
Every study inevitably has it’s ambiguities, so in the process of data research, cause and effect analysis and comparison estimation, this thesis tries carry out the study conscientiously.
以下是你发的4个提问，共3段，翻译的不好请指正。
PARA ONE
Personally, I think that, because of the differences in cultures, histories and ideologies between China and foreign countries, their journalism and education inevitably bear the above features.
However, they have similarities, too. From the perspective of historiography, if we look back on Chinese and American journalism, it is easy to find out that they both have gone through the similar development orbits. For instance, their newspapers have experienced three historical stages of development: remark newspapers (standpoint newspapers in China) → political party newspapers → business newspapers (commercial newspapers in China).
Furthermore, education has its universal law, and journalism as an independent subject with very strong practicality is the same in both the two countries with no lacks of comparison.
On the other hand, China's and America's journalism also have the very prodigious differences and their education respectively has their own features.
In America journalism is subjected to economy, while in China it is subjected doubly by economy and politics.
Speaking of the economy-journalism relations, in America journalism is industrialized, and in China mass media is also marketizing, but actually different from that of the US.
The journalism in China is different in form, but is suspected of taking over that of the US in its content.
From the viewpoint of academic history of journalism, the systems, views and methods of some journalism works kept identical with those of America on the whole.
To compare Chinese and Amercian journalism education, to explain detailly and objectively the culture , history and ideology which it relies on, will benefit us directly in estimating the feasibility if its method to be applied in China.
PARA TWO
The perspective and content by which things can be compared are very complicated.
Speaking of the connotation of this thesis, politics, society and culture background of the objects under study are different, so making the objects under study comparable is the basic premise.
Therefore, first it’s essential that we set the range of time of the thesis from the end of 1970s’ and the beginning of 1980s’ until now.
After 1978, freeed itself from the standstill dilemma of the Culture Revolution, Chinese education begun to revive and develop gradually; almost simultaneously (1982-1994) mass media in the US developed quickly, employees increased 40%, which, too, stimulated the development of journalism education.
Only by ascertaining the study in this specific scope of time, the comparison is comparable, reliable and effective.
Then it’s nessasary that we define the specific content and criteria of the comparison, such as training target, professional standard, curriculum set-up, teaching approach, education investment, governmental adjustment and control, the profiling of students and faculty, employment, other education forms and characteristics and so on.
This study focuses on the above integrated standard, identical comparison items and scope throughout the process of comparison.
Only when the both parties are comparable, and when they can be examined and estimated according to mutual standard, it’s possible that we make the study meaningful.
PARA THREE
Secondly, data collection and detailed desription.
Speaking of this thesis, data collection includes reference to documents, investigation and interview, symposium, examination on the spot and so on.
In order to reflect the objests under study comprehensively and objectively,
In the meantime, it’s necessary that the researchers be aware to select the data which are representative and convincing to make our reseaching target of comparison between Chinese and American journalism education phenomena meaningful and effective.
And by integrating the researching activities, making method scientific and statistics and measurement accurate, it’s ensured that the conclusion we get be correct and all the data be true and reliable.
Thirdly, seeing that journalism education is complicated itself, and the factors confined journalism education are of great quantity, it’s necessary that after the acquisition of large numbers of comparable data on Chinese and Amercian journalism edcation, we use the viewpoints and knownledge from mass media, pedagogy, pedagogical psychology, sociology, culturology，and political economics to explain and analyze, categorize them, and classify them into different types, so as to compare them comprehensively and multi-dimensionally surrounded the thesis, classify and compare the similarities and differences between Chinese and American journalism education, explain the origin of the similarities and differences between the two countries and make comprehensive analyses using dialetical and relative viewpoints.
Forthly, on the basis that similarities and differences are analyzed carefully, the journalism education of both countries are estimated comprehensively, essential law of education phenomenon is further explored.
Because of the difference in the way of thinking, it’s likely that different deduction and explanation can be made.
Every study inevitably has it’s ambiguities, so in the process of data research, cause and effect analysis and comparison estimation, this thesis tries carry out the study conscientiously.
2, oneself total hair 3 turn over Han to translate English chapter(word number all not more than 400 words), such as have an ability, 3 all translation very excellent, wish in addition to hang to appreciate of each 200 cent, again annex 200 cent;
3, is to be give by friend, so anxious, on-line etc., speed quick, the quality excellent get.
Thank everyone big shrimp ～～～
1 ,尊重人脑翻译,下降机器翻译;
2 , 自己的头发共3翻汉翻译英文章(字数各不超过400字) 例如有能力,有3翻译都非常出色, 想除坑地欣赏每200左右,再200件以上; 3 , 是被赋予了朋友,这么着急,在线等,速度快,品质优良的机缘.
Article is as follows:（下面的就不复制了）
译：自己认为,中国和外国的历史,文化相异的是,从外观意识, 新闻教育必然采取上述characteristic.but两者也有相似的地方,看到从史学, 回牟中美洲的新闻是不难发现, 这两个新闻都经历相似的发展轨道, 如报纸的所有经验讲话报纸(中国的立场是报纸)→政党报纸→商业报纸(中国工商报)三个历史 stage.again发展,教育已普遍规,新闻是实践很强的独立学者说, 这两个国家也是同源,不缺乏能比它place.on另一方面, 中国新闻媒体对美国也有很大的差异, 新闻教育也各有特点,是新闻工作的美国遭受经济上遏制 但中国当时受到政治与经济的双重控制程序方面的关系,经济和 新闻业,美国是一个中等工业转,但中国媒体又在对准市场转, 但有不同于美国的特点,新闻中,在形式上虽不同于美国 国,其内容, 还是已经焕发就提出美国suspicion.see从新闻学术史 有些系统 站在新闻工作及方法,在顶层是符合保持的联合国states.rightness中美洲新闻 教育做了比较,以及它的文化, 历史靠意识和外观进行细致客观的阅读, 将直接受益于酌这种行事方式是,在中国应用的可能性.
~……你看看吧 ：以下的翻译：
我觉得中国和外国的历史,文化相异的是,从外观意识, 新闻教育必然需要上述characteristic.but双方也有同样的地方,看到从史学, 回牟中美洲不难发现新闻, 双方的journalisms都经历了同样的发展轨迹, 如该报资深言语报纸(中国的立场是报纸)→政党报纸→商业报纸(中国工商报)三个历史 stage.again发展,教育已普遍规,新闻是一个很强烈的独立学者,一个圆满地说, 两国也是一样的,也不是没有地方可以compare.on另一方面, 新闻中,中国与美国也有很大的差异与新闻教育也是每个 有一个特点,新闻工作的美国遭受经济上遏制 但经济和政治的双重控制,然后受到了目前我国对关系经济 新闻,美国是一个中型工业转 而中国媒体也在走向市场转 但有一个特点,不同于美国的新闻状态,是中国在形式上虽然与美国 相异,就其内容, 还是已经焕发了怀疑谨美states.see从新闻学术史 有些系统 站在新闻作品和方法,在整出符合保持的联合国states.to中美洲新闻教育 这样的比较,以及它的文化, 历史意识和外观依赖进行了细致客观读 将可直接受益于区分这种行事方式,在可能适用于中国.
倒数第二篇翻译：本人以为,中国和外国的文化,历史和theideology不同, 新闻教育的必然tohave地区的上述特点. 但两人却也有同样的地方,但从历史的角度来看, 轮流头部中americajournalism并不难以发现, 两个journalisms allexperienced有相似的发展道路, 就像报纸allexperienced认为报纸(中国的报纸观点) " >政党报纸- " >商业报纸(中国 forcommercial报纸)三个历史发展阶段. 同时, theeducation具有普遍规律,这条消息是一个非常实用纪律strongindependent说, 两国又都是相同的,是notdeficient已经可以比较的地方. 在另一方面, 70,588 ,中国的新闻事业也有很大的差异,新闻educationalso各有特色. 我们的新闻economicalcontrol ,但中国获得的经济和政治dualcontrol . 谈到经济发展与新闻的关系,芝加哥的中等工业 但中国的媒体也是移动towardsthe市场 但实际上却有不同征集的characteristic.china的新闻,虽然是不同的形式,与美国, 但要比内容,其实还是有不喜欢模仿的american.anew听到学术史的角度看, 一些新闻workssystems ,观点和方法是一致的,在整个withus的维修. 这对中国和美国的新闻educationcompares ,以及对文化, 历史和意识形态对itsdepends进行仔细客观
最后一段T：我认为中国和外国的文化,历史和意识形态不同,新闻难免有这些特点. 但双方也有共同的,从历史角度来看, 所指的美国新闻不难发现,这个消息已经通过一个类似 的发展道路. 如果报纸经历报纸言论(意见,中国作为一个报纸)→党报→商业报纸(中国商业报纸) 三个历史发展阶段. 同时,教育是一个普遍规律,对新闻界是一个强大而独立的实用科目, 这两个国家是一样的. 毫无缺乏可比性. 另一方面, 中国和美国也是新闻事业有很大的分歧,新闻有自己的 特色. 美国新闻的经济控制中,是受经济和政治的双重控制. 关于经济和社会事业的关系,美国是媒体业的发展, 而且中国传媒市场. 它是由不同特征的美国. 中国形式的新闻,在美国,尽管不同,但就实质内容而言, 还有拷贝美国公众. 从新闻的角度,学术史的一些新闻作品, 制度和方法,对整个与美国保持一致. 消息美国做更多的教育,也要靠文化, 历史和意识形态方面进行了细致和客观的解释, 将直接受益于这一做法歧视可行性的applicationi
以下是你发的4个提问，共3段，翻译的不好请指正。
PARA ONE
Personally, I think that, because of the differences in cultures, histories and ideologies between China and foreign countries, their journalism and education inevitably bear the above features.
However, they have similarities, too. From the perspective of historiography, if we look back on Chinese and American journalism, it is easy to find out that they both have gone through the similar development orbits. For instance, their newspapers have experienced three historical stages of development: remark newspapers (standpoint newspapers in China) → political party newspapers → business newspapers (commercial newspapers in China).
Furthermore, education has its universal law, and journalism as an independent subject with very strong practicality is the same in both the two countries with no lacks of comparison.
On the other hand, China's and America's journalism also have the very prodigious differences and their education respectively has their own features.
In America journalism is subjected to economy, while in China it is subjected doubly by economy and politics.
Speaking of the economy-journalism relations, in America journalism is industrialized, and in China mass media is also marketizing, but actually different from that of the US.
The journalism in China is different in form, but is suspected of taking over that of the US in its content.
From the viewpoint of academic history of journalism, the systems, views and methods of some journalism works kept identical with those of America on the whole.
To compare Chinese and Amercian journalism education, to explain detailly and objectively the culture , history and ideology which it relies on, will benefit us directly in estimating the feasibility if its method to be applied in China.
PARA TWO
The perspective and content by which things can be compared are very complicated.
Speaking of the connotation of this thesis, politics, society and culture background of the objects under study are different, so making the objects under study comparable is the basic premise.
Therefore, first it’s essential that we set the range of time of the thesis from the end of 1970s’ and the beginning of 1980s’ until now.
After 1978, freeed itself from the standstill dilemma of the Culture Revolution, Chinese education begun to revive and develop gradually; almost simultaneously (1982-1994) mass media in the US developed quickly, employees increased 40%, which, too, stimulated the development of journalism education.
Only by ascertaining the study in this specific scope of time, the comparison is comparable, reliable and effective.
Then it’s nessasary that we define the specific content and criteria of the comparison, such as training target, professional standard, curriculum set-up, teaching approach, education investment, governmental adjustment and control, the profiling of students and faculty, employment, other education forms and characteristics and so on.
This study focuses on the above integrated standard, identical comparison items and scope throughout the process of comparison.
Only when the both parties are comparable, and when they can be examined and estimated according to mutual standard, it’s possible that we make the study meaningful.
PARA THREE
Secondly, data collection and detailed desription.
Speaking of this thesis, data collection includes reference to documents, investigation and interview, symposium, examination on the spot and so on.
In order to reflect the objests under study comprehensively and objectively,
In the meantime, it’s necessary that the researchers be aware to select the data which are representative and convincing to make our reseaching target of comparison between Chinese and American journalism education phenomena meaningful and effective.
And by integrating the researching activities, making method scientific and statistics and measurement accurate, it’s ensured that the conclusion we get be correct and all the data be true and reliable.
Thirdly, seeing that journalism education is complicated itself, and the factors confined journalism education are of great quantity, it’s necessary that after the acquisition of large numbers of comparable data on Chinese and Amercian journalism edcation, we use the viewpoints and knownledge from mass media, pedagogy, pedagogical psychology, sociology, culturology，and political economics to explain and analyze, categorize them, and classify them into different types, so as to compare them comprehensively and multi-dimensionally surrounded the thesis, classify and compare the similarities and differences between Chinese and American journalism education, explain the origin of the similarities and differences between the two countries and make comprehensive analyses using dialetical and relative viewpoints.
Forthly, on the basis that similarities and differences are analyzed carefully, the journalism education of both countries are estimated comprehensively, essential law of education phenomenon is further explored.
Because of the difference in the way of thinking, it’s likely that different deduction and explanation can be made.
Every study inevitably has it’s ambiguities, so in the process of data research, cause and effect analysis and comparison estimation, this thesis tries carry out the study conscientiously.
本人以为中外文化、历史和意识形态不同，新闻教育不可避免地带有上述特征。
Personally, I think that, because of the differences in cultures, histories and ideologies between China and foreign countries, their journalism and education bear the above characteristics inevitably.
但两者也有相似之处
However, they have similarities as well.
从史学的角度看，回眸中美新闻事业不难发现，两者的新闻事业都经历了相似的发展轨迹，如报纸都经历了言论报纸（中国为观点报纸）→政党报纸→商业报纸（中国为商业性报纸）三个历史发展阶段。
From the viewpoint of historiography when we look back on China's and America's journalism, it is easy to discover that they both have gone through the similar development orbits. For example, their newspapers have experienced three historical stages of development: remarks newspapers (standpoint newspapers in China) → party newspapers → business newspapers (commercial newspapers in China).
又，教育是具有普遍规律的，就新闻是一门实践性很强的独立学科来说，两国也是相同的，不乏有可比之处。
Furthermore, education has the universal law, and journalism as an independent discipline with very strong practicality is the same in both the two countries with no lacks of comparison.
另一方面，中国和美国的新闻事业亦有着很大的差异，新闻教育也各有特点。
On the other hand, China's and America's journalism also have the very prodigious differences and their education respectively has their own characteristics.
美国的新闻事业受经济控制，而中国的则受经济和政治双重控制。
In Americam journalism is controlled by economy, while in China it is controlled doubly by economy and politics.
就经济与新闻事业的关系而言，美国是媒介产业化，而中国传媒也在走向市场化，但却有着不同于美国的特点。
Speaking of the economy-journalism relations, America journalism is industrialized, and Chinese media institution is also moving towards marketization, but actually different from that of the US.
中国的新闻事业在形式上虽与美国不同，但在内容上，却仍有照搬美国之嫌。
The journalism of China is different in form, but is suspected of imitating that of the US in content.
从新闻学术史的角度看，一些新闻学著作的体系、观点和方法在整体上与美国的保持一致。
From the viewpoint of academic history of journalism, the systems, views and methods of some journalism works kept identical with those of America on the whole.
对中美新闻教育做以比较，并对其所依托的文化、历史和意识形态进行细致客观的解读，会直接嘉惠于判别这种做法在中国应用的可行性。
Compare Chinese journalism and education with American ones, and carry on a careful objective understanding to the culture, history and ideology which it relies on, and it will benefit us directly in estimating the feasibility of its method to be applied in China.
哥们，我先翻译的是第二篇，发现这篇和第二篇一样的，那你就参考一下吧
1, respect person brain translation, decline machine translation;
2, oneself total hair 3 turn over Han to translate English chapter(word number all not more than 400 words), such as have an ability, 3 all translation very excellent, wish in addition to hang to appreciate of each 200 cent, again annex 200 cent;
3, is to be give by friend, so anxious, on-line etc., speed quick, the quality excellent get.
Thank everyone big shrimp ～～～
Article is as follows:
Oneself think Chinese and Foreign culture, history is dissimilarity from consciousness appearance, news education inevitably take the above-mentioned characteristic.But both also have likeness of place, see from the angle of historiography, return to Mou Central America the journalism be not difficult detection, both of journalism all experience likeness of development track, such as newspaper all experience speech newspaper(China is standpoint newspaper) →political party newspaper →business newspaper(China is business newspaper) three history development stage.Again, education have widespread regulation, the news is a fulfillment very strong of independence academics to say, two country is also homology of, don't lack can ratio it place.On the other hand, China and the journalism of the United States also have very big of difference, news education also each have a characteristics.The journalism of the United States is subjected to economic curb, but China of then be subjected to economy and politics dual control.In regard to the relation of the economy and journalism, the United States be a medium industry to turn, but China media also at alignment the market turn, but have to differ from the United States of characteristics.The journalism of China at formality although different from the United States, on the contents, still have already shone on to move the United States of suspicion.See from the angle of news academic history, some system, standpoint of Journalism work and method at whole top is consistent with keep of the United States.Rightness Central America news education do with comparison, and as to it's the culture, history rely on and consciousness the appearance carry on meticulous objective of reading, would direct benefit in discretion this kind of way of doing is in China application of possibility.
